disease
I comment on a syndrome (syndrome), illness, the disease with this article as a similar concept in a mass.
There is the argument that the problem of the ethic of the politics was able to pick quarrel with it is a vague concept, and the disease assumes what a disease and I am sick and what do not do.
I "am normal" where and cannot easily define where I sentence to "abnormality".
One way of thinking costs differences from a standard value to plus or minus 2* SD if normal and bend and do gaps more than it when abnormal.
There is a way of thinking to define uniformly when I say a form and essence / a state to be seen in under total 5% to be abnormal because about 95% of the population are included in this range in normal distribution.
However, all 10,000,000 of them will do corpulence to bring the diabetes that there is a patient said to and many complications with normalcy in Japan when I just employ these Sadayoshi for "a disease", and there is not an underlying disease particularly again, and high height and the person that it was it carry it out accidentally, and a problem whether is "a disease" produces it.
In other words there is unreasonableness in defining a disease by technique of statistics objectively without I cannot say, and can assert that I am sick if abnormal even if I am abnormal if sick.
On the contrary, there is the thing that I completely do an ill definition for a value judgment when "the person himself or circumference feels inconvenience in mind and body and is in condition to expect improvement".
"The person himself or circumference" does not feel inconvenience in the life to the person himself in a mental disease and the mild disease, but the reason is because there is a case to feel necessity of the treatment so that neighboring people cause a delay in life.
If the person himself or circumference does not feel necessity of the treatment, I do not need to have a checkup, and the practical problem is hard to produce a hospital by such a definition.
As for these, it may be said that it is true in this sense and, by the reason of not feeling a problem in the life, a person diagnosed by a dependency / addiction and osteoporosis and a doctor insists on oneself being healthy or but when it is personality, the physical disability is insisted on not an obstacle (a wide meaning, kind of the illness).
There is the argument that the problem of the ethic of the politics was able to pick quarrel with it is a vague concept, and the disease assumes what a disease and I am sick and what do not do.
I "am normal" where and cannot easily define where I sentence to "abnormality".
One way of thinking costs differences from a standard value to plus or minus 2* SD if normal and bend and do gaps more than it when abnormal.
There is a way of thinking to define uniformly when I say a form and essence / a state to be seen in under total 5% to be abnormal because about 95% of the population are included in this range in normal distribution.
However, all 10,000,000 of them will do corpulence to bring the diabetes that there is a patient said to and many complications with normalcy in Japan when I just employ these Sadayoshi for "a disease", and there is not an underlying disease particularly again, and high height and the person that it was it carry it out accidentally, and a problem whether is "a disease" produces it.
In other words there is unreasonableness in defining a disease by technique of statistics objectively without I cannot say, and can assert that I am sick if abnormal even if I am abnormal if sick.
On the contrary, there is the thing that I completely do an ill definition for a value judgment when "the person himself or circumference feels inconvenience in mind and body and is in condition to expect improvement".
"The person himself or circumference" does not feel inconvenience in the life to the person himself in a mental disease and the mild disease, but the reason is because there is a case to feel necessity of the treatment so that neighboring people cause a delay in life.
If the person himself or circumference does not feel necessity of the treatment, I do not need to have a checkup, and the practical problem is hard to produce a hospital by such a definition.
As for these, it may be said that it is true in this sense and, by the reason of not feeling a problem in the life, a person diagnosed by a dependency / addiction and osteoporosis and a doctor insists on oneself being healthy or but when it is personality, the physical disability is insisted on not an obstacle (a wide meaning, kind of the illness).